<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/styles/feed.css"?>
<title type="html">suka's blog</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/atom.xml" />
<updated>2007-07-25T23:11:18+02:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
<uri>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog</uri>
</author>
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/</id>
<generator uri="http://nanoblogger.sourceforge.net" version="3.3">NanoBlogger</generator>
<entry>
<title type="html">GUADEC was G-R-E-A-T (mostly)</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/07/25/index.html#e2007-07-25T19_35_11.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/07/25/index.html#e2007-07-25T19_35_11.txt</id>
<published>2007-07-25T19:35:11+02:00</published>
<updated>2007-07-25T19:35:11+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[As a lot of people already blogged about it, this won't come along as the most inventive
statement ever, but: This year's GUADEC was awesome (mostly, see further down), lot's of cool stuff 
going on in the GNOME world atm, and a very necessary wakeup call / reality check for everyone in the community. Some of my 
personal highlights:
<br /><br />
*) Quite a bunch of new ideas floating around, like the GNOME Online Desktop, PyroDesktop or other 
things like clutter and the stuff going on in the mobile space. Besides what one might think of 
each individual concept, what's - in my opinion - really important here is that people are trying to 
experiment with new ideas.
<br /><br />
*) Great to see some movement in the gtk+ area, especially interesting that the people 
from the mobile space where the most vocal ones in cheering for some bigger changes / improvements. 
The <a href="http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2007-July/msg00078.html" 
target="_blank">current plan</a> seems to 
be to get a phase of experimentation going to see what people really need, something which should 
result in a gtk+ 3.0 (or 4.0 ;) ) at a not yet defined point in the future.
<br /><br />
*) Lot's of interesting new applications floating around in the GNOME universe, like the 
as-easy-as-it-gets personal file sharing application Giver, Banter or Conduit. Unfortunately none of 
them in portage. Honestly I really would like Gentoo to get more "cutting-edge" again, an appeal it 
has more an more lost since I started to use it (or did my expectations raise over the years 
instead?). But that's really something for a seperate blog entry.
<br /><br />
*) I guess the best thing just happened by accident: As there really wasn't a lot going on in 
Birmingham in the evening and the weather sucked big time, lot's of people stayed in the lobby of the ETAP hotel and 
did some collective hacking / planning / writing / whatever. (The ETAP having free wireless didn't 
hurt either ;) ) 
<br /><br />
*) Met lot's of nice people, too many to name them all here, you know who you all are ;)
<br /><br />
So what were the bad things (besides the shitty weather)? I guess the same as ever (and unfortunately 
valid for nearly all open source projects I know):
<br /><br />
*) There are still a lot of non-outspoken hierarchies in the whole project. This ranges from 
seemingly harmless constant in-jokes which are actually excluding everyone who hasn't been an 
"insider" for ages to a very visible distinction between the "rockstar"-hackers and everyone else. I still think 
GNOME - and other open source projects - would fair better by valueing non-coder contributions more. 
The very intersting talk Anne Ostergaard gave about the organizational structure (and current 
problems with that) in FLOSS was unfortunately also one of the least well attended ones.
<br /><br />
*) But what I really find annoying (and after some days: exhausting) is the level of stupid remarks 
a lot of guys seem to have to make about women all the time. The same guys who say some very smart and 
thoughtful things about all sorts of stuff transform into Neanderthals in parts of a second when it 
comes to women, mostly reducing them to their looks. Obviously for a lot of guys it's just not 
possible to treat women with the same level of respect they show for other guys.
<br /><br />
To sum it up: A very good conference from a technical viewpoint, but still a lot of room for 
improvement when it comes to social skills. ]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">Heading for GUADEC 07</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/07/12/index.html#e2007-07-12T18_12_10.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/07/12/index.html#e2007-07-12T18_12_10.txt</id>
<published>2007-07-12T18:12:10+02:00</published>
<updated>2007-07-12T18:12:10+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[It's GUADEC time again :) I'll be there starting from Saturday (evening), hope to see some fellow Gentoo developers there, maybe we can meet up again for a little drink or two.]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">OpenOffice.org goes Tango, me goes Brainshare</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/04/01/index.html#e2007-04-01T22_23_11.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/04/01/index.html#e2007-04-01T22_23_11.txt</id>
<published>2007-04-01T22:23:11+02:00</published>
<updated>2007-04-01T22:23:11+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[Been very busy lately, still managed to get some OpenOffice.org-related stuff done. openoffice-bin 
2.2.0 is already in the tree, source-based version should follow in the not-to-distant future. In the 
meantime, I've updated openoffice-2.1.0-r1 to the latest ooo-build-patchset which - besides a bunch of 
bugfixes - brings real beauty to OOo: A whole new <a href="http://tango.freedesktop.org" 
target="_blank">Tango</a>-based iconset. But see for yourself:<br /><br />
<img src="images/oootango.png" />
<br /><br />
Besides that I've been mostly occupied with my day-job lately which is - as some of you might know - 
writing for the <a href="http://derstandard.at" target="_blank">online edition of the Austrian 
newspaper 'DER STANDARD'</a>. For this I've been visiting Novell's Brainshare two weeks ago, which was 
a bit exhausting (two days at airports and on airplanes for three days of stay in Salt Lake city, 
add to this the joy of getting my back flight from Chicago cancelled), but interesting nonetheless.
<br /><br />
This time I also decided to publish two of the pieces I wrote in english (in addition to german). 
One with Mono-lead Miguel de Icaza (<a 
href="http://derstandard.at/?id=2818611" target="_blanK">'The Microsoft / Novell partnership 
should have included a 
technical Mono/.NET collaboration'</a>) and one with Nat Friedman (<a 
href="http://derstandard.at/?id=2827627" target="_blank">'Flamewars are part of 
the community culture'</a>). There is lot more in there as the headline can express, so if you 
are 
interested in Mono or the Linux / GNOME desktop, you might find some interesting bits in there. If 
not: My bad ;)]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">On OpenOffice.org 2.1.0</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/01/03/index.html#e2007-01-03T17_39_15.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2007/01/03/index.html#e2007-01-03T17_39_15.txt</id>
<published>2007-01-03T17:39:15+02:00</published>
<updated>2007-01-03T17:39:15+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[I've got some requests lately, asking when openoffice-2.1.0 will hit the tree, so I thought 
I'd better answer this publicly: While openoffice-bin-2.1.0 is in since the day of its release, the 
source based build takes a little bit longer this time. The reason simply being us using 
ooo-build, which hasn't seen a release for 2.1.0 yet. If you don't know: ooo-build is a 
multi-distro effort which makes building OpenOffice.org a lot easier and also offers a bunch 
of enhancements over the vanilla version of OOo. This time though a lot of the other distros 
had major releases recently, so most of the work went into the 2.0.4-branch, leaving 2.1.0 
in sort of an unfinished state.
<br /><br />
After the holidays development has gained speed again, so a release shouldn't be to far away. 
The Gentoo-specific stuff is mostly set, so expect an ebuild in the tree shortly after that.]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">Heading to GUADEC</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2006/06/22/index.html#e2006-06-22T09_07_53.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2006/06/22/index.html#e2006-06-22T09_07_53.txt</id>
<published>2006-06-22T09:07:53+02:00</published>
<updated>2006-06-22T09:07:53+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[It's <a href="http://www.guadec.org">GUADEC</a>-time! This will be my first one, so really looking forward to it. 
I'll be there starting from Friday, staying (nearly) the whole week.
<p>
The <a 
href="http://guadec.org/GUADEC2006/schedule/">schedule</a> looks very promising, in particular I'm looking forward 
to all the "next-generation"-stuff like <a href="http://www.beatniksoftware.com/gimmie/">Gimmie</a>. Also seeing 
<a href="http://www.gnome.org/~michael/">Michael</a> talk about OpenOffice.org should be fun.]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">Xgl</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2006/02/04/index.html#e2006-02-04T17_22_22.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2006/02/04/index.html#e2006-02-04T17_22_22.txt</id>
<published>2006-02-04T17:22:22+02:00</published>
<updated>2006-02-04T17:22:22+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[Following recent trends in the coolness department, decided to play around with Xgl and glxcompmgr a bit. Thanks to the 
<a href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~hanno/" target="_blank">Overlay from Hanno</a> and <a 
href="http://www.hboeck.de/item/266" target="_blank">his 
instructions</a> not too much hassle to setup. Had to modify some keyboard-stuff with xmodmap to get the Super_L-key 
(better known as the left Windows-Key) to work and to enjoy all of the effects glxcompgr provides , but after that, I 
have to 
admit: Wow. This is seriously cool stuff. Have been wobbling, zooming, rotating for some time now and am already addicted 
to it ;) Ok, admitted: Most of this is "only" eye candy to impress your friends (which should not be underestimated in 
getting people 
interested in the Linux desktop), but a few things come in handy. Like the hardware-accelerated zoom stuff, which is very 
nice accessibility-wise, or the Expose-goodness. Best is you can combine all this stuff, for example you can zoom in on 
the Expose-view and even rotate it at the same time, while the windows (for example running videos or loading 
webpages) are update all the time. And the speed is also quite impressive :)
<br /><br />
If someone has no clue what I'm talking about, check the recent news about the upcoming Novell Linux Desktop 10, or take 
a look at <a href="http://www.linuxedge.org/?q=node/55" target="_blank">some videos</a> of the presentation Nat Friedman 
gave a few days in Paris.]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">Cleanups</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2006/01/22/index.html#e2006-01-22T11_03_02.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2006/01/22/index.html#e2006-01-22T11_03_02.txt</id>
<published>2006-01-22T11:03:02+02:00</published>
<updated>2006-01-22T11:03:02+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[Finally all archs have moved over to openoffice / openoffice-bin 2.0.x, so now is the time right time 
for a big cleanup. I've already removed openoffice-ximian-bin (which I never felt quite comfortable with 
anyway, as we used the package of another distro), openoffice-ximian will be the next.
<br /><br />
Since I blogged the last time there also was the release of openoffice-2.0.1, no major new stuff, mostly 
bug fixes. One thing most of you won't have noticed though: For GNOME users there is now a built-in 
quickstarter (only in the built from source version), it's still a little bit rough around the edges, 
but it generally works :)
<br /><br />
If you want to try it out, go to Tools > Options > OpenOffice.org > Memory and select "Load 
OpenOffice.org during system start-up". Unfortunately it won't add itself to the session atm, so you 
will have to do this by hand too. Just add "ooffice2 -quickstart -nologo -nodefault" in the GNOME 
session preferences.
<br /><br />
And here the obligatory screenshot:
<br /><br />
<img src="images/quickstarter.png" />]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">GCC optimization</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/21/index.html#e2005-10-21T21_27_05.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/21/index.html#e2005-10-21T21_27_05.txt</id>
<published>2005-10-21T21:27:05+02:00</published>
<updated>2005-10-21T21:27:05+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[The new Issue of the Red Hat Magazine has an interesting article about <a href="http://www.redhat.com/magazine/011sep05/features/gcc/"
target="_blank">"performance tuning with gcc"</a>, by one of the gcc devs. Take a look at it, especially if 
you feel the constant need to use obscure CFLAGS ;)
<br /><br />
Some interesting quotes:
<br /><br />
<pre>In most cases, obtaining the very last nanosecond of performance is not terribly important. Optimization follows a distinct 
curve of diminishing returns. Most applications will thrive with the default transformations done at -O2, and since some of the more 
esoteric flags are seldom used, your code may behave erratically because of latent bugs in your application (for example, the code 
may be violating language aliasing rules).</pre>
<br /><br />
and:
<br /><br />
<pre>An even bigger problem is the interactions between optimizing transformations. It is not uncommon for different optimizations to 
interfere or even cancel each other out, so by combining many different flags, you may be causing more harm than good.]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">OpenOffice.org 2.0 is out!</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/20/index.html#e2005-10-20T20_02_14.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/20/index.html#e2005-10-20T20_02_14.txt</id>
<published>2005-10-20T20:02:14+02:00</published>
<updated>2005-10-20T20:02:14+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[Title says it all, OpenOffice.org 2.0 is finished at a last. Even better: We already have it in portage, both -bin 
and the source based version are ready. So what are you waiting for? Emerge it and enjoy all the new goodness! To all 
openoffice-ximian-users: Don't forget to change to app-office/openoffice-2.0.0! (see more about that in <a 
href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/#e2005-10-11T17_25_31.txt">this earlier posting</a>)
<br /><br />
<img src="images/ooo20.png" />
<br /><br />
Enjoy!]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html">2.0 is coming</title>
<author>
<name>Andreas Proschofsky</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/11/index.html#e2005-10-11T17_25_31.txt" />
<id>http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/archives/2005/10/11/index.html#e2005-10-11T17_25_31.txt</id>
<published>2005-10-11T17:25:31+02:00</published>
<updated>2005-10-11T17:25:31+02:00</updated>
<content type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<![CDATA[After all the delays, it finally looks as if OpenOffice.org 2.0 will be released any day now :) In preparation for that the first 
source-based version has hit the tree now, so if you have got some free cpu time left and want to see how much better it is than the 
1.1.x-series, just unmask it (by adding >=app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2 to /etc/portage/package.unmask) and go ahead!
<br /><br />
<b>SOME FAQS</b>
<br /><br />
<b>*) I've been using openoffice-ximian until now, should I wait for a new version of this instead?</b>
<br /><br />
No, openoffice-2.0 is the <a href="archives/2005/08/#e2005-08-30T19_48_41.txt">successor of the 
old openoffice-ximian</a>, it contains everything you learned to love about the -ximian-versions 
(and lot's more), so go ahead!
<br /><br />
<b>*) What would be the best way to upgrade from openoffice-ximian to the new openoffice-2.0 package?</b>
<br /><br />
Just for the unlikely ;) situation that something goes wrong with the build make a package of openoffice-ximian:
<br /><br />
<i># quickpkg openoffice-ximian</i>
<br /><br />
After that just unmerge openoffice-ximian and emerge openoffice-2.0 (don't forget to unmask it, see above!)
<br /><br />
<i># emerge -C openoffice-ximian && emerge openoffice</i>
<br /><br />
Wait, wait more, and wait even longer until it completes (yes, OOo 2.0 takes even longer to build than 1.1.x). If something went wrong, 
you will still be able to recover the old version (if you built the package), by doing:
<br /><br />
<i># emerge -k =app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.3.16</i> (Assuming the last version you used was 1.3.16, if not just replace the number)
<br /><br />
<b>*) What's the difference between openoffice-bin and openoffice?</b>
<br /><br />
openoffice-bin just takes the official binaries provided by the OpenOffice.org-project, while openoffice is built from source. While 
the -bin has lot's of cool new stuff in relation to 1.1.x (like most of the things you know from the old -ximian-version), the source 
provides some extra goodies like even better integration for KDE people (KAdressbook-connectivity and Crystal icons), a UI for 
switching between the different available icon sets and a Gentoo splash screen ;) Though be warned: The source based version takes 
quite some time to build and needs lot's of diskspace (see below), while the -bin installs quick. So you will have to decide if the 
extra goodies are worth the extra wait.
<br /><br />
<b>*) Ok, so what are the minimum requirements to build OOo 2.0 from source?</b>
<br /><br />
You will need 4-6 GByte free on the partition you build it on (by default this is in /var/tmp/portage), also don't 
bother to try with less than 256 MByte RAM.
<br /><br />
<b>*) How long will it take to build?</b>
<br /><br />
On my Athlon XP 3200+ (1,5 Gigs RAM), the build of openoffice-2.0.0_rc2 took 7 hours, 17 minutes and 20 seconds
<br /><br />
<b>*) Will it build on my AMD64-box?</b>
<br /><br />
I'm afraid the answer is: No. This is under heavy development, but didn't get finished in time for 2.0
<br /><br />
<b>*) Why does the ebuild for such a heavy package not use distcc?</b>
<br /><br />
Cause it tends to break the build, so it is disabled by default. If you really want to try out emerge openoffice with
<br /><br />
<i># WANT_DISTCC="true" emerge openoffice</i>
<br /><br />
<b>*) I'm not getting the native GNOME / KDE file selector, but the original OOo one, why is that?</b>
<br /><br />
Cause this is the default setting. Go to Tools > Options > OpenOffice.org > General and de-select the checkbox for "Use OpenOffice.org 
dialogs"
<br /><br />
<b>*) But I don't want all this KDE / GNOME cruft!</b>
<br /><br />
Then just build openoffice with -gnome and -kde in your use flag, and you'll be able to re-uglify your OOo!
<br /><br />
<img src="http://dev.gentoo.org/~suka/blog/images/ooo20rc2.png" />
<br /><br />
Enjoy :)]]>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
