media-fonts/vlgothic

Static analysis

Repoman

repo.eapi.deprecated media-fonts/vlgothic/vlgothic-20090811.ebuild: 0
repo.eapi.deprecated media-fonts/vlgothic/vlgothic-20101218.ebuild: 0
repo.eapi.deprecated media-fonts/vlgothic/vlgothic-20110414.ebuild: 0
repo.eapi.deprecated media-fonts/vlgothic/vlgothic-20110722.ebuild: 0

pkgcore-checks

  StaleUnstableKeyword: version 20090811: no change in 1713 days for unstable keywords [ ~x86-fbsd ]
  StaleUnstableKeyword: version 20101218: no change in 1264 days for unstable keywords [ ~alpha, ~amd64, ~ia64, ~ppc, ~ppc64, ~sparc, ~x86, ~x86-fbsd ]
  StaleUnstableKeyword: version 20110414: no change in 1144 days for unstable keywords [ ~alpha, ~amd64, ~ia64, ~ppc, ~ppc64, ~sparc, ~x86, ~x86-fbsd ]
  StaleUnstableKeyword: version 20110722: no change in 856 days for unstable keywords [ ~x86-fbsd ]
  MissingChksum: version 20090811: file VLGothic-20090811.tar.bz2 is missing required chksums: sha512, whirlpool; has chksums: rmd160, sha1, sha256, size
  MissingChksum: version 20101218: file VLGothic-20101218.tar.bz2 is missing required chksums: sha512, whirlpool; has chksums: rmd160, sha1, sha256, size
  MissingChksum: version 20110414: file VLGothic-20110414.tar.bz2 is missing required chksums: sha512, whirlpool; has chksums: rmd160, sha1, sha256, size
  MissingChksum: version 20110722: file VLGothic-20110722.tar.bz2 is missing required chksums: sha512, whirlpool; has chksums: rmd160, sha1, sha256, size
  UnstableOnly: for arch x86-fbsd, all versions are unstable: [ 20090811, 20101218, 20110414, 20110722 ]
  LaggingStableInfo: version 20110722: stabled arches [ alpha, amd64, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86 ], potentials [ ~x86-fbsd ]
  RedundantVersionWarning: version 20090811: slot(0) keywords are overshadowed by version '20110722'
  RedundantVersionWarning: version 20101218: slot(0) keywords are overshadowed by version '20110722, 20110414'
  RedundantVersionWarning: version 20110414: slot(0) keywords are overshadowed by version '20110722'

Sub-slot candidates

This lists all sub-slot candidates without regard to their appropriateness. Please check with the appropriate maintainer before implementing them.

Nothing to report