07:08 <    je_fro@> dberkholz, seems that the folks over at ivtvdriver.org are trying to be more freedesktop compliant... they've renamed some of their stuff. I'm thinking of adding x11-drivers/xf86-video-ivtv and phasing out xf86-video-ivtvdev.
07:08 < dberkholz@> nah, i was just reading a book by joel spolsky about hiring programmers
07:09 <    je_fro@> dberkholz, what would you do?
07:09 < dberkholz@> had a little section of things to not even go near
07:09 <    je_fro@> http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/xf86-video-ivtv/ChangeLog
07:09 < dberkholz@> je_fro: what's the story between dev and other? just a rename?
07:09 <    je_fro@> dberkholz, lots of changes
07:10 <    je_fro@> seems there's increased interest and things are moving along once again
07:10 < dberkholz@> what would be easiest for anyone using the driver
07:10 < dberkholz@> probably add the new one, but treat it as a package move
07:10 <    je_fro@> imo, telling them to switch to the new driver via masking and removal
07:11 <    je_fro@> package move... I'll read up on that. Will it induce a blocker and so forth?
07:11 < dberkholz@> the old ebuild's ~arch on everything, so you can just get rid of it
07:11 <    je_fro@> cool, that's what I want to do
07:11 <    je_fro@> start fresh
07:12 < dberkholz@> je_fro: nothing to do with blockers... what it does is tells portage to convert any installed programs of oldname to newname, with the previous version
07:13 < dberkholz@> a package move of ivtvdev to ivtv will give users with ivtvdev an installed ivtv-0.10.6