Last meeting: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20090409-summary.txt


EAPI=3: Provisional approval
----------------------------

Here are all features I saw that received a "no" on-list. Answers of 
"no" and "query" are starred. Only CONTROLLABLE-COMPRESS got both "no" 
and "critical" votes.


> * ANY-USE

betelgeuse: yes
cardoe: yes
dberkholz: yes
dev-zero: yes
*leio: no

> * DOEXAMPLE
> * DOINCLUDE

betelgeuse: yes
cardoe: yes
*dberkholz: no
dev-zero: whatever doexample; yes doinclude
*leio: no

> * BANNED-COMMANDS

betelgeuse: yes
cardoe: yes
dberkholz: whatever
dev-zero: yes
*leio: no for dohard

> * UNPACK-IF-COMPRESSED

betelgeuse: yes
cardoe: yes
*dberkholz: no
dev-zero: yes
*leio: query (for same reason as dberkholz, plain files)



Goals: Any unanswered queries? Figure out what to do with features 
receiving a "no." Vote on approval of the spec once questionable 
features are resolved. Get progress update in portage from zmedico.


GLEP 54: Dealing with live SCM packages
---------------------------------------

Goal: Are we prepared to vote? If so, vote on approval of GLEP 54.


Handling EAPI versioning in a forwards-compatible way
-----------------------------------------------------

Goal: Are we prepared to vote? If so, vote on the implementation for the 
problem solved in GLEP 55.


[dberkholz: I'm not prepared]


Handling static libraries more flexibly
---------------------------------------

Goal: Vote on whether to move forward with USE=static-libs to control 
building of static libraries.